Leadership
Potential
Leadership
According to Kruse (2013), leadership
is a process of social influence, which maximizes the effort of others, towards
the achievement of a goal. According to Miller (2014), defining leadership is
difficult and there are many terminologies or definitions for it in Google.
According to him, defining the actions of leadership is the hardest and most
crucial part, which involves inwards thinking of a person’s abilities and
tendencies.
Similar definition by Tannenbaum et al
(1961), described leadership as an interpersonal influence, exercised in
a situation, and directed, through the communication process, toward the
attainment of a specified goal or goals. Another definition
by Cribbin (1981), defined leadership as an influence process that
enables managers to get their people to do willingly what must be done, do well
what ought to be done.
Leadership
Styles
Trait-Based Leadership Perspective
According to the trait based leadership
approach leadership is defined based on pure personal perspective, such as personal
qualities, characteristics and personalities. In other words, according to this
theory leader are born, and the theory focuses on identifying behavioral
characteristics which are common in leaders (Educational Business Articles, 2016) . Here some of the
most common leadership traits identified are,
·
Intelligence and
action oriented judgment
·
Eagerness to accept
responsibility
·
Task competence
·
People skills
·
Capacity to motivate
others
·
Flexibility
·
Creativity
·
A need to accomplish
·
Courage and resolution
·
Assertiveness
·
Trust worthiness
Using this theory corporations or
organizations can identify natural leaders at early stages and target them as
second layers for development or grooming. Therefore, the management can groom these
leaders in a manner which befits the corporate culture and its strategic goals
and objectives.
Transactional and Transformational Leadership
This theory defines leadership by the
manner in which leaders get the work done from their employees or followers.
According to Ingram (2018), transactional leadership is defined as a style more
concerned with maintaining the normal flow of operations. According to this,
transactional leaders use disciplinary power and array of incentive to motivate
employees to perform their best. In other words, it is a bargain between the
leader and the team, where leader motivates subordinates by exchanging rewards
for performance. This type of leadership is crucial for companies where strict
following or adhering to guidelines is a must.
According to Ingram, transformational
leadership on the other hand is defined a style which goes beyond managing
day-to-day operations. It involves crafting strategies for taking the company
to the next level of performance or success through team-building, motivation
and collaboration of employees at different levels of the organizational
hierarchy.
According to this theory, a leader is
identified by his or her behavior and patterns of doing things. In order to
better explain this managerial leadership grid can be utilized.
The Blake Mouton managerial grid was
developed by Robert Blake and Jane Mouton to describe different styles of
leadership based on common behavioral attributes. According to this model there
are five distinct leadership styles.
·
Impoverished
Management: This refers to managers who are mostly ineffective, with low
regards to creating systems that get the job done and with little interest in
creating a satisfying or motivating team environment
·
Authoritative-Compliance
Management: Managers who believe that their teams are a simple means to an end.
The team needs are always secondary to productivity. These managers are
basically autocratic with strict work rules, policies and procedures with
punishments serving as a main motivation factor for team members.
·
Middle of the Road
Management: Managers who are status-quo, and tries to balance the needs of the
people with the results of the organization or company. Here only mediocre
performance is achieved due to inability to highly motivate team for
performance and failing to meet the needs of the people fully.
·
Country-Club
Management: Are managers who are accommodating to their team members, always
concerning themselves with the members’ wellbeing, needs and feelings. Work
environment with this leadership style tends to be relaxed and fun, and is good
for inspiring creativity and self-directed teams. But productivity generally
suffers due to lack of control and direction.
Team Management:
According to this model, team management approach is the most effective
approach. This leadership style reflects leader who is passionate about his or
her work and does the best he or she can for his or her team. This type of
managers, commit to their organizational goals and objectives, motivate the
people to work hard and stretch themselves to achieve greater feats of
productivity
References
Available at: https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_73.htm
[Accessed 24 July 2018].
[Accessed 24 July 2018].
· Page, M., 2018. Top
11 benefits of networking. [Online]
Available at: https://www.michaelpage.com.au/advice/career-advice/career-progression/benefits-networking
[Accessed 19 April 2019].
Available at: https://www.michaelpage.com.au/advice/career-advice/career-progression/benefits-networking
[Accessed 19 April 2019].
·
R. Tannenbaum, I.
W. F. M., 1961. Leadership and organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zhu, J., 2019. What is Self-Awareness and Why it is
Important?. [Online] Available at: https://positivepsychologyprogram.com/self-awareness-matters-how-you-can-be-more-self-aware/


Interesting article,Leadership is the key factor which is directly affected for the performance of a organization.
ReplyDeleteLeadership is truly a matter for organisations. Done.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much. This a very comprehensive presentation. Very useful.
ReplyDeleteMost of the current working companies in Sri Lanka should adapt to the "Country-Club Management" leadership style. Thank you for giving in depth insights
ReplyDeleteThe term "leadership potential," at first glance, can seem too subjective to be useful. Employees with a strong desire for things like results, recognition, advancement, and influence – and willingness to make necessary trade-offs in other areas to get them – have the high aspirations that mark high-potential leadership candidates. good article nicely explained
ReplyDeletenice explanation with leadership,is this related to your organization?
ReplyDelete